Choosing the Entity Type of Your Startup

Jan 24, 2021

A crucially important step of starting and running a business is choosing which business organization your company will take.  With C-Corporations, S-Corporations, Partnerships, LLCs, GPs, LPs, LLPs, and, yes, LLLPs, the choice is anything but simple. While tax implications often lead the conversation, choosing the proper entity structure can make meeting the capital expansion needs, adding more investors and owners, and planning for exit strategies significantly easier.


The complexity of the decision leads to the one consistent piece of advice for the vast majority of entrepreneurs regarding the choice of entity. That is to seek the help of a business attorney. The business attorney will be able to ensure that all specific tax, employment, ownership, and funding goals for your company are considered, whether you, as the founder, thought of the issue or not. 


Nonetheless, if you’re an entrepreneur or aspiring to be one, you probably want to learn more about this consequential decision.  This blog is meant to provide considerations likely to arise in a choice-of-entity conversation with your lawyer.  This blog is not legal advice; in fact, the only advice to be drawn from this blog is that you seek a lawyer in making this decision.


Before diving in, it is important to lay this piece of groundwork.  C-Corporations, the entity form of nearly all publicly traded companies, is subject to a double tax, one on the corporate level and one on the shareholder level while S-Corporations, LLCs, and other Partnership forms, are pass-through entities subject to tax only at the ownership level.  While LLCs are currently the most common form of new business entity because of their flexibility, the current corporate tax rate of 21% might make the C-Corporation the optimal choice.  It depends on your specific plan.


If you plan to reinvest all of your business’ earnings back into it in order to facilitate growth, then C-Corporations likely are going to be your best option depending on the tax rates of the owners.  Currently, any earnings that are kept in a C-Corporation are subject to a 21% tax rate and, as long as those earnings have a designated purpose by the board of directors, will not be subject to an accumulated earnings tax. Earnings of pass-through entities, including LLCs, are taxed at the rates of their owners ranging from 10% to 37%.  Further for pass-through entities, there is a newly qualified business income tax deduction that may allow for a 20% deduction of the shareholder's taxable income from a qualified business.  The difference between having to pay taxes on 21% and 37% of earnings is enough to control the choice of entity decision in most cases, but clearly, the difference is not always as stark as 16%.  A tax professional should assist in determining the applicable tax rates.


If the business will be your full-time employment and is structured in a way that is meant to provide for you and your family, then the ability to bailout earnings and other tax considerations, such as self-employment taxes or the fringe benefit deduction, may control your decision.  Opposite to retaining earnings, when a C-Corporation distributes earnings it is subject to a double-tax leading to a much bigger tax bite.  C-Corporation distributions are subject to the 21% tax rate and the shareholder's dividend rate, which could range from 0% to 20%.  Pass-through entities will only be subject to the single tax at the owner’s rate; plus the qualified business income deduction of 20% may be available.  Seems like a simple decision, but, as promised, it gets more complex.  Partnership distributions may be subject to self-employment taxes, while C-Corporation distributions are not.  Shareholders and employees of C-Corporations, but not pass-through entities, have the fringe benefit deduction available to them, which would also allow you, as an employee, to have benefits such as group-term life insurance or medical-dental insurance plans. 


If meeting the needs of your investors are your highest priority, then it will depend on their preference for return on investment.  One of the few controlling factors is the investor's willingness to pay taxes on income that was retained in the company and to undertake the risk of company audits reaching their returns.  Investors unwilling to pay taxes on income not received in hard cash or to complicate their personal tax returns will require a C-Corporation form as all pass-through entities put the investor at risk of those consequences.  Other investors may wish for losses to be allocated to them to recoup their investment while the business is unprofitable.  These investors, often those with other streams of income, will opt out of investing in C-Corporations because losses in C-Corporations are retained with the business.  Instead, their needs are better served by a pass-through entity which will allocate losses based on the Operating or Partnership Agreement.  Further, these investors, if not material participants in the operations, may be seeking to increase their passive income, which allow gains to be offset by losses and losses to offset other business gains.


If maintaining control is your main concern, it will turn on the aggressiveness of your investors in seeking control.  Corporations, C or S, and limited partnerships give the majority shareholders control over the business without an agreement stating otherwise, but the minority often has no control rights or authority over the business.  This lack of rights may give pause to minority investors who want to have more say in the business operations.  LLCs and general partnerships require operating/partnership agreements to layout the control structure of majority and minority interest holders.  If the minority investors are aggressive and eventually a threat to overtaking the company, then negotiating the control rights of both groups in an operating agreement could lead to loss of control rights that otherwise would have been secured if a C or S Corporation or limited partnership was chosen.


Finally, if selling out at the end is your ultimate goal, then a variety of factors can push the discussion.  First, when an owner sells a pass-through entity, the realized gains are taxed based on the owner’s proportional interest in the company with each owner paying their individual income tax rate on their portion.  This single tax is unlike C-Corporations which must pay 21% of the realized gain at the corporate level before the remainder is taxed on the shareholder level at each individual’s income or capital gains tax rate. With that said, the shareholders of the C-Corporation may qualify for the Section 1202 deduction, which could eliminate the tax at the shareholder level.  Now for more complexity; the basis the shareholder has in their interest can dictate the amount of income that has to be recognized.  If earnings have been retained in the C-Corporation, the basis of the shareholders is likely still relatively low, which will lead paying tax on more income.  The same is not true of pass-through entities because the shareholder's basis is increased by the entity’s earnings.


Clearly from this brief overview, this decision is very complex and significantly more nuanced than one may be led to believe.  In most cases, you will have competing interests that require a balancing analysis of the pros and cons.  Even if you have read this whole blog, which would show extreme dedication to learning, this decision shamelessly requires the help of an attorney. 

By Evan Knowles 15 Feb, 2023
Today’s tip is about how to use ChatGPT to summarize an article, book, legal document, and other long-form text. It's a great way to save time and learn.
By Evan Knowles 08 Feb, 2023
Today’s AI Edge is about how to use ChatGPT for tips on how to start and plan a project or task.
By Logan Jones 16 Dec, 2022
Sustainable Nuclear Fusion, Artificial Intelligence, and Quantum Computing
By Evan Knowles 05 Dec, 2022
What happens when you have zero percent interest rates, ESG, stimulus money, COVID, and SPACs colliding all at once? AppHarvest. AppHarvest’s SPAC and rocket ship success now appear to be a malicious cash grab by investment bankers and global elites enabled by the highly controversial ESG (Environmental, Social, and Governance) movement. Whether the founding team was aware of what would eventually happen, I cannot be sure; however, I do know there has been poor execution from the leadership team and bad actors like Jeffrey Ubben, who infiltrated the company early to use it as a financial vehicle to quickly cash out millions dollars while the state of Kentucky and everyday retail investors were left holding a falling knife. Like everyone, I was initially bought in. The state was bought in. The media was bought in. We all bought into AppHarvest. It's amazing how far saying all the right things will get you. Entrepreneurs and politicians have this gift. They communicate their visions to rally people behind them, and Jonathan Webb is a master of the craft. He masterfully leveraged his experience in DC, free capital, SPACs, the ESG movement, and the narrative of a struggling state (Kentucky) to raise $1.5 Billion dollars in less than 5 years for a dream manifested on a whiteboard years before. Props to him for making his dream a reality… seriously. I want to have empathy for a fellow entrepreneur and don’t want anything to come across as an attack. Give the man props, BUT the problem with dreams is that you have to wake up to face reality. Facts are the facts and reality is setting in… Middle Tech had Jonathan on the podcast in the early days before any construction started and they had a small team that had just finished raising a $100 million Series A. I left that interview having mixed feelings. I was super excited for the state and for Jonathan’s team, and I walked out of the interview saying “He felt extremely scripted like a politician.” I don’t like politicians very much by nature, but I quickly looked past it because I’m not one to judge based on a first encounter and founders tend to develop scripts when they raise capital. I know I have with my own company.
By Lincoln Day 19 Apr, 2022
How existing entities can get involved in the development of Agtech startups
By S.A. Barker 24 Feb, 2022
There are two sides of a coin. At least that was my rationalization as to why I failed to transition from SHIB to DOGE in the previous article before edits. I conflated the two because, well, I conflate them. They are linked in my mind and as they are in the memes. Just as a dog pack has the alpha and omega, dog coins have DOGE and SHIB. Crypto heralds a new age of currency, and it behooves us to attempt to get a grip on what currents are moving just under the surface. In the moment-to-moment flotsam and jetsam of Twitter, there is an ever-present struggle to separate the wheat from the chaff, artistry from con-artistry. This grappling with what constitutes real currency eerily mirrors the 20 th Century’s grappling with what constitutes real art. My attention went from a casual observer of crypto on the periphery to a keener interest, when SHIB made a billionaire of a mysterious whale. The victory was short-lived with one tweet from Musk answering the question of how much SHIB he held: None. The subsequent crash led to discourse about the value of crypto as a whole, and much trashing of SHIB INU. Interesting that SHIB took all the heat for being a shit coin and was an obvious “bad boy” in the crypto space with the audacity to claim value where none was “deserved”, while DOGE was spared the infamy. Just as SHIB was devalued by the influence of Musk, DOGE has been lifted to the point of tender to acquire merch from Tesla. As of the time of writing, Mcdonald's is now the point of focus of pressure from the DOGE community to accept DOGE coin. To accept the inevitable. And in the process, become part of the discourse. Obviously, we are adrift in a time of great uncertainty. Just as thick fog surrounds a ship, multitudes of articles and conjectures obscure the ability to chart a course with any confidence. If you do find yourself in a state of analysis paralysis for too long, consider flipping a coin.
17 Feb, 2022
When you look at the Lexington skyline... you should think of Dudley Webb. Born in a small coal mining community, Dudley Webb brought his talents to Lexington through the University of Kentucky school of Law where after practicing for several years, he and his brother morphed into Massive Real Estate Developers - creating what is now "The Webb Companies". Under the Webb Brother's leadership, The Webb Companies grew into one of the largest real estate development organizations in the country, with projects across the U.S. from New York to San Francisco and Boston to Miami. Our conversation covered his personal and professional background, growth constraints in a booming city, and the Future of Lexington from Dudley's perspective. Welcome to Season 2 of DevelopLex - a new series from Middle Tech diving into the ins & outs of real estate development and investing here in Lexington, Kentucky. This series will feature interviews with some of Lexington's most prominent real estate developers that have played a major role in building Lexington into what it is today. Hosted by Weston Lockhart & Evan Knowles DevelopLex is proud to be supported by: SVN Stone Commercial Real Estate Community Trust Bank Lexington Pavement Sweep Intro music by SmithTheMister
14 Feb, 2022
Kyle Mohler is the Founder and CEO of Insignum AgTech, a biotechnology company working in the AgTech space to engineer plants that can change their pigment whenever they contract a disease, alerting the farmer so that they can take early action. Our conversation with Kyle focuses on how Insignum’s technology was developed, the benefits that it gives to farmers, the ethics & implications of bio-engineering in general, and Kyle’s experience growing a business in Indiana. Learn more about Insignum at InsignumAgTech.com
12 Feb, 2022
Evan overviews how everything about being an entrepreneur boils down to one key skill: sales.
11 Feb, 2022
Logan, Nate, and Evan discuss Cash App adding the Lightning Network, Disney’s victories in the streaming wars, and Peloton’s recent struggles. Watch Middle Tech's Friday Updates LIVE at 8:30am EST on Instagram every week! @MiddleTechPod Today's Friday Update is sponsored by KY Innovation, Bolt Marketing, and Render Capital.
More Posts
Share by: